Whenever I see people arguing for surfing to be included in the Olympics I think to myself, “That makes perfect sense. With all the cities losing money on hosting the Olympics, what we need is Big Surfing to further exploit that for their own interests. Just like they exploit the sport, the athletes, and the environment, Big Surf needs an exploited audience to further their dreams for profit. And why should Big Surf focus on looking after the athletes it currently has when it can get away with paying the women considerably less and fining anyone who speaks up against it?”
In this article, Fernando Aguerre, President of the International Surfing Association explains why surfing is appropriate for the Olympics:
The key factors in determining a sport’s suitability for the Olympic programme include youth appeal, universality, popularity, good governance, respect for athletes and respect for the Olympic values.
Let’s deconstruct why Big Surf thinks surfing matches those ideals, from the perspective of a woman who has noticed that Big Surf doesn’t actually value women athletes and pays them less than half what they pay the male competitors.
Big Surf’s advertising relies on what much of advertising relies on- the appeal of youth and the pursuit of youthfulness. The recent Roxy teaser promoted sexuality as an integral part of this, but the sport itself goes further by referring to its athletes as ‘girls’. Young women in their twenties are defined as female children. Anyone ever think it was a bit odd that surfing commentators never called the men on tour boys? When are these ‘girls’ allowed to grow up?
There is of course, another side to this ‘youth appeal’ and that is that many brands consider their most important source of revenue to be children. The Olympics is as guilty as Big Surf of hoping to promote themselves to younger audiences who cannot distinguish fact from opinion and are vulnerable to suggestion. There are groups working to promote laws to stop advertising being directed at kids for this reason. Many websites set up for children are there to develop brand recognition and loyalty before kids can even critically think. Surfing’s youth appeal? A carefully managed advertising strategy that hopes to further capitalise on this.
You might argue that sport is good for kids. Not necessarily. In particular, not when it promotes traditional roles of gender that stereotype and marginalise a vast proportion of the population. Like, oh, women.
Universality in the Olympics refers to people being entered into competitions in spite of inability to meet standards, because their inclusion would promote equality. I’m not sure how surfing would meet this criteria because it’s hard enough for some countries to send women in just running events, let alone allow them to surf.
The idea that surfing is universal is an interesting notion, given that there are so many cities completely inland who would then have to develop wave pools if surfing was to be at the Olympics. But aside from that, surfing has a reputation for not promoting equality. Its insistence on selling surfing via sex would further make it difficult for women in some countries to gain entrance through surfing to the Olympics.
I haven’t even begun to mention the ‘entitlement’ issues that surfing’s elite seem to indulge in. From reading articles demanding the right to party, to seeing advertising promote privilege of men above the rights of women- surfing seems to promote the status quo and privilege rather than universality. I personally find Big Surf’s attitude to gender to be well off the mark by modern standards.
Surfing is popular in some populations, but primarily, its competitions do not attract large audiences. Its sexy advertising and blatant focus on objectifying young women attracts more ‘views’ than Kelly Slater.
Steph Gilmore’s, Alana Blanchard’s and Anastasia Ashley’s top YouTube videos respectively combine for around 7 million “views.”
— Surf Media Truths (@SurfMediaTruths) August 10, 2013
We spent the last minute searching for Kelly Slater YouTube clips close to the aforementioned numbers and found ONE: https://t.co/cGNP4laj3l
— Surf Media Truths (@SurfMediaTruths) August 10, 2013
Even if surfing does have an audience, can you judge it on views? Views can be ‘bought’, as can ‘likes’, as anyone in Social Media can find out. There is an audience for the spectacle of surfing, and that is what Big Surf are hoping to offer the Olympics, but the actual competition of surfing is often in appalling conditions with the worst of the waves seemingly reserved for the women. I like surfing, and I can hardly bare to watch it. You can’t ‘buy’ popularity no matter how many views you have on YouTube videos or Live feeds. True popularity is people actually doing it, and people actually engaged in the sport, not people you anticipate will surf or will buy surfwear after exploiting the Olympics.
- Unequal pay for women.
- Inability to adhere to basic drug testing standards
- Decisions to hold surf competitions in inappropriate locations with poor conditions
- Inability to take responsibility for its lack of guidance for own athletes, firing people while not actually bothering to instil proper education and career pathways
- Censoring its own athletes for speaking up against it
- Sponsoring companies that don’t look after their supply chain, the environment or athletes
This is surfing as I see it. I’m not an industry insider and this is the sport’s reputation to me. Blatant sexist advertising and sexism in its prize packets is not indicative of good governance.
Respect for Athletes
I’ve started a petition because:
@VishOnAMish BTW: “In 2009, the Winter X Games instituted a policy that prize winnings for women would be equal to those for men.” from ehow
— Waves_SF (@Waves_SF) July 29, 2013
Let’s not even get into the previously mentioned sexist advertising, and the outrageously sexist commentary at most surf events. Let’s just focus on the price tag. That’s what Big Surf calls ‘respect’.
After all this, what is it about surfing that belongs at the Olympics itself? That stands for the Olympic Ideals? We haven’t even got into that. But here’s a link, and notice that it mentions promoting women’s participation. I’m assuming promotion means you don’t treat them as completely inferior to men at every given opportunity.
If you think I’ve missed a few points, feel free to leave a comment, and I’ll endeavour to write a post under 1000 words dismissing the idea that women in surfing are properly represented, and arguing that they deserve better before Big Surf decide to focus on a place in the Olympics.
What price, progress? Will Big Surf at least advocate a decent prize packet for women while it pours its resources into lobbying for Olympic status?
If you’re a good surfer and you’re gonna get paid for it, it’s a big plus.